Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued Dec. 11, 1979.

Decided Jan. 11, 1980.

*587 On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Middlesex County, whose opinion is reported at 163 N.J.Super. 589, 395 A.2d 530 (1978).

Robert A. Vort, Newark, for plaintiff-appellant.

Martin A. Spritzer, Metuchen, for defendants-respondents (Martin A. Spritzer, Metuchen, attorney; Dennis J. Conklin, Metuchen, on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Furman in his opinion at 163 N.J.Super. 589, 395 A.2d 530 (Ch.Div.1978). See also, Bogen v. Doty, 598 F.2d 1110 (8 Cir. 1979).

Copyright © 2001 by West Group. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of the original work prepared by a U.S. government officer or employee as part of that person's official duties. All rights reserved. No part of a Westlaw transmission may be copied, downloaded, stored in a retrieval system, further transmitted or otherwise reproduced, stored, disseminated, transferred or used, in any form or by any means, except as permitted in the Westlaw Subscriber Agreement or with West's prior written agreement. Each reproduction of any part of a Westlaw transmission must contain notice of West's copyright as follows: "Copr. © West 2001 No claim to original U.S. government works." Registered in U.S. Patentand Trademark Office: Westlaw, WIN, WESTNET, EZ ACCESS and Insta-Cite. WIN natural language is protected by U.S. Patent Nos. 5,265,065 and 5,418,948 and 5,488,725.